Chapter 3 - Conservation and Management
 
3.2 Ecosystem approach

3.2.1 Extent to which CCAMLR decisions take account of and incorporate an ecosystem approach to management

Recommendation Responsible body Activities to date Status
3.2.1.1 Explicit mechanisms, agreements and reporting should be developed to provide coherence and compatibility of research, monitoring and CMs within the Convention Area, including areas of high seas and areas of national jurisdiction. SCIC/SC/
Commission
(2008)SC-CAMLR-XXVII, paragraphs 10.2 and 10.10;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII/7;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII, paragraphs 10.7–10.10;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII, paragraphs 10.5, 10.7 and 10.8.
Scientific Committee In progress – spatial management and area protection is adequately addressed in the work program for MPA.
SCIC – In progress – advanced steps.
3.2.1.2 Explicit mechanisms, agreements and reporting should be developed with relevant nations and organisations to provide compatibility of management measures, research and monitoring between the Convention Area and areas outside the Convention Area that contain species relevant to CCAMLR achieving the objectives of the Convention. SC/
Commission
(2008)SC-CAMLR-XXVII, paragraphs 10.2 and 10.10;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII/7;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII, paragraph 10.13.
Commission – MOU with WCPFC and working with RFMOs close to CAMLR Convention Area.
Scientific Committee – In progress – Chairs of CEP and CCAMLR SC participate in the meetings of both groups.
3.2.1.3 An explicit and active process should be developed to anticipate threats from fishing and environmental change, and to develop appropriate approaches through research, monitoring and/or precautionary CMs to address them before they become manifest. SC/
Commission
(2008)SC-CAMLR-XXVII, paragraphs 10.2 and 10.10;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII/7;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII, paragraphs 10.5 to 10.10.
Scientific Committee – In progress – Observer system
3.2.1.4 A more coordinated and coherent approach to ecosystem monitoring and research should be developed and adopted. Other recommendations by the RP address separately the monitoring of harvested species, monitoring of species that are dependent, associated or in the same ecosystem as harvested species, better coordination with monitoring and research in regions of State jurisdiction within the Convention Area, and development of management procedures that make use, or take account, of CEMP-like monitoring information. The recommendation here is for these to be viewed, planned and reported coherently to support CCAMLR’s implementation of the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries. For example, there may be merit in expanding the role of CEMP beyond the krill-centric ecosystem view, and for development of a single program to be responsible for the monitoring needs of all of CCAMLR’s management including a wider range of invertebrates, fish and wildlife (e.g. Weddell seals). Commission/
SC
 
(2008)SC-CAMLR-XXVII, paragraphs 10.2 and 10.10;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII/7;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII, paragraphs 10.5 and 10.7 to 10.10.
Scientific Committee – In progress – review of CEMP
3.2.1.5 Develop mechanisms to address burden-sharing for research and monitoring among Members so as to reduce the current reliance on a small number of Members and consequent risk to CCAMLR’s management approaches if any of these Members reduced their input (this issue is also discussed in Chapter 7). The RP viewed this with particular concern, given the fundamental importance of research and monitoring to the CCAMLR management approach and the difficulties experienced by scientists in securing funding for monitoring. SC (2008)SC-CAMLR-XXVII, paragraphs 10.2 and 10.10;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII/7;
(2009)SC-CAMLR-XXVIII, paragraphs 10.15 to 10.20;
(2009)CCAMLR-XXVIII, paragraphs 16.6 to 16.13 and 16.17.
Scientific Committee - In progress – Effort to involve more scientists in CCAMLR science. Capacity building